Philosophy AS flashcards

All 100 cards

1. Card 1

   Define 'a posteriori' knowledge and explain how it relates to the cosmological argument.

   A posteriori knowledge is knowledge gained from experience. The cosmological argument is considered a posteriori because its premises are based on observations and experiences of the world, such as motion, causation, and contingency, rather than purely logical deductions.

2. Card 2

   How does Aquinas's First Way (motion) lead to the conclusion of a First Unmoved Mover?

   Aquinas's First Way observes that everything in the world is in motion. He argues that nothing can move itself, and an infinite regress of movers is impossible. Therefore, there must be a first unmoved mover that initiates all motion, which Aquinas identifies as God.

3. Card 3

   Explain the core premise of the Kalam cosmological argument regarding the universe's beginning.

   The Kalam argument posits that everything which begins to exist has a cause. Since the universe began to exist (a premise supported by scientific evidence like the Big Bang theory), it must therefore have a cause. This cause is then argued to be God.

4. Card 4

   What is the 'fallacy of composition' as applied by Hume and Russell to critique the cosmological argument?

   The fallacy of composition suggests that what is true of the parts is not necessarily true of the whole. Hume and Russell argued that just because individual parts within the universe have causes, it does not logically follow that the universe as a whole must also have a cause.

5. Card 5

   Imagine a scientist observing the intricate balance of forces in the early universe, allowing for star formation and galaxy development. How might this observation be used to support a teleological argument?

   A scientist observing such precise cosmological conditions might argue that this fine-tuning points to a deliberate design. The specific values of these forces seem too improbable to have occurred by chance, suggesting an intelligent designer orchestrated them to allow for the development of complex structures like stars and galaxies, aligning with the anthropic principle.

6. Card 6

   What is the key difference between an inductive argument and a deductive argument, and which type is the cosmological argument?

   An inductive argument provides evidence that supports the conclusion, making it probable but not logically guaranteed. A deductive argument, if its premises are true, logically proves the conclusion. The cosmological argument is inductive, meaning its premises offer support for belief in God but do not offer absolute logical proof.

7. Card 7

   According to Aquinas's Third Way, what is the significance of 'contingency' in arguing for a necessary being?

   Aquinas's Third Way observes that everything in the world is contingent, meaning it could either exist or not exist. If everything were contingent, then at some point, nothing would have existed, and consequently, nothing would exist now. Therefore, there must be a non-contingent, or necessary, being that brought contingent things into existence, which is God.

8. Card 8

   How does the 'Library Example' illustrate the Kalam argument's rejection of actual infinities in nature?

   The Library Example describes a library with an infinite number of books, half red and half blue. If you remove the infinite blue books, an infinite number of red books still remain. This scenario highlights the absurdities that arise when applying the concept of actual infinity to physical reality, suggesting that actual infinities cannot exist in nature and thus an infinite regress of causes is impossible.

9. Card 9

   What is Russell's 'brute fact argument' in response to the cosmological argument?

   Russell's brute fact argument suggests that the universe might simply exist without any explanation or cause. He contended that it is not necessary to assume the universe must have an explanation, and that it could simply be 'there' without a deeper reason, challenging the premise that everything requires a cause.

10. Card 10

    A biologist discovers a new species of bird with incredibly complex wing structures perfectly adapted for high-altitude flight. How might William Paley use this discovery to support his design argument?

    Paley would likely point to the intricate and purposeful design of the bird's wings, much like the components of a watch. He would argue that such a complex and perfectly adapted structure could not have arisen by chance, but rather must be the product of an intelligent designer, just as a watch implies a watchmaker. This aligns with his design qua purpose argument.

11. Card 11

    Which of the following best describes the nature of the Cosmological Argument?

    A) It is a priori and deductive. B) It is a posteriori and inductive. C) It is a priori and inductive. D) It is a posteriori and deductive. A) The correct option is B. The cosmological argument is based on experience (a posteriori) and its premises provide evidence for the conclusion rather than logical proof (inductive).

12. Card 12

    According to Aquinas's 5th Way, what is the 'telos' of things in the universe?

    Aquinas's 5th Way, part of the teleological argument, suggests that things in the universe follow natural laws that control their behavior towards a specific goal or purpose (telos). He argues that since these things are not sentient enough to direct themselves, there must be an intelligent designer guiding them towards their purpose.

13. Card 13

    How does Copleston respond to Russell's brute fact argument?

    Copleston counters Russell by stating that philosophy and science inherently seek explanations for why things are true. He argues that it is not a valid philosophical move to simply assume the universe has no explanation, as this goes against the very spirit of inquiry that drives scientific and philosophical investigation.

14. Card 14

    Explain Tennant's aesthetic principle as an argument for God's existence.

    Tennant's aesthetic principle argues that humanity's capacity to perceive and appreciate beauty goes beyond what is necessary for survival. Since this ability does not offer a clear evolutionary advantage, Tennant suggests it could not have been solely a product of natural selection, implying that God must have intervened in evolution to design humans with this aesthetic sense.

15. Card 15

    A group of scientists is debating the origin of the universe. One scientist argues that the universe's existence requires no further explanation, stating 'it just is.' Another scientist counters that such a position halts scientific inquiry. Which philosophical debate are they echoing?

    This debate echoes the exchange between Bertrand Russell's 'brute fact argument' and Frederick Copleston's response. Russell suggested the universe might simply exist without cause, while Copleston argued that such an assumption goes against the fundamental drive of philosophy and science to seek explanations.

16. Card 16

    What is the main observation that forms the basis of the teleological argument?

    The teleological argument is primarily based on the observation of order, complexity, and apparent purpose in the natural world. Proponents argue that these features suggest a deliberate design rather than random chance.

17. Card 17

    Which of the following is NOT a premise of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument?

    A) Everything in motion must have been moved by something else. B) Everything has a cause. C) Everything is contingent. D) The universe began to exist. A) The correct option is D. While the Kalam argument posits that the universe began to exist, Aquinas's three ways focus on motion, causation, and contingency, not explicitly the universe's temporal beginning.

18. Card 18

    How does the concept of 'infinite regress' relate to both Aquinas's and the Kalam argument?

    Both Aquinas's and the Kalam argument reject the possibility of an infinite regress of causes, movers, or contingent beings. They argue that if such an infinite chain existed, the present state of affairs (motion, existence, the universe) could never have begun or been actualized, thus necessitating a first, uncaused, or necessary being to initiate the chain.

19. Card 19

    Imagine a complex ecosystem where every species plays a vital role in maintaining balance, from pollinators to decomposers. How might this scenario be used to illustrate Aquinas's 5th Way?

    Aquinas's 5th Way could be applied by observing the goal-directedness of the ecosystem. Each species, though not sentient enough to understand its role, acts in a way that contributes to the overall stability and purpose of the ecosystem. This intricate, purposeful interaction suggests an external intelligence or designer (the 'archer') that directs these non-sentient elements towards a common goal.

20. Card 20

    According to Hume, why is an infinite regress not an illogical idea?

    Hume argued that the idea of an infinite regress is not inherently illogical because it does not contain any self-contradictory concepts. He contended that just because humans cannot fully conceive of an actual infinity, it doesn't mean it's impossible or self-contradictory in reality, thus challenging the need for a first cause.

21. Card 21

    What is the primary difference between Paley's design qua purpose and Tennant's anthropic principle?

    Paley's design qua purpose focuses on the intricate functionality and complexity of specific natural phenomena (like the human eye or a watch) to infer a designer. Tennant's anthropic principle, on the other hand, highlights the extremely precise and rare cosmological and chemical conditions necessary for the emergence and sustenance of life and human existence, suggesting these conditions were deliberately fine-tuned by a designer.

22. Card 22

    A philosopher argues that the universe is like a perpetual motion machine, constantly moving and changing without any external input. How would Aquinas's First Way likely respond to this claim?

    Aquinas's First Way would argue that even a 'perpetual motion machine' must have had an initial impetus. Nothing can move itself, and an infinite chain of past motions without a beginning is impossible. Therefore, even if the universe appears self-sustaining now, it would still require a 'First Unmoved Mover' to initiate that perpetual motion.

23. Card 23

    If someone argues that the universe is a 'self-causing' entity, which part of the Kalam argument would they be directly challenging?

    They would be directly challenging the premise of the Kalam argument that states 'everything which begins has a cause.' If the universe is self-causing, it implies it either caused itself (which is logically problematic as it would have to exist before it existed) or it didn't 'begin' in the sense of needing an external cause, thereby undermining the need for a transcendent cause.

24. Card 24

    Consider a situation where a group of engineers designs a self-repairing robot that can adapt to new environments. How might this scenario be used to counter Paley's Watchmaker Analogy?

    This scenario could counter Paley by suggesting that complex, seemingly purposeful systems can arise through internal mechanisms and evolutionary processes, rather than requiring direct, external design at every stage. The robot's ability to self-repair and adapt implies an initial design for adaptability, not necessarily continuous intervention for every specific outcome, weakening the direct analogy between a watch and the universe's every detail.

25. Card 25

    Which of the following describes the relationship between the premises and conclusion in an inductive argument?

    A) The premises logically guarantee the truth of the conclusion. B) The premises make the conclusion probable, but do not guarantee it. C) The conclusion must be false if any premise is false. D) The premises and conclusion are unrelated. A) The correct option is B. In an inductive argument, the truth of the premises provides evidence that supports belief in the conclusion, making it probable, but it does not logically prove or guarantee the truth of the conclusion.

26. Card 26

    Define the term 'teleological argument' and explain its inductive nature.

    The teleological argument, also known as the argument from design, posits that the apparent order, complexity, and purpose in the universe point to an intelligent designer, typically God. It is inductive because its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion, but do not logically guarantee its truth. The conclusion is probable, not certain.

27. Card 27

    According to Aquinas' 5th Way, how does the observation of natural laws lead to the inference of a designer?

    Aquinas' 5th Way argues that things in the universe follow natural laws, guiding them towards specific goals or purposes (telos). Since these things are not sentient enough to have created these laws themselves, there must be an external intelligence, a designer, who established these natural laws and directed them towards their ends.

28. Card 28

    A group of scientists discovers a new planet with an atmosphere perfectly balanced for sustaining complex life, intricate geological formations that regulate temperature, and a unique ecosystem where every species plays a critical role in maintaining the planet's stability. How might a proponent of Paley's design qua purpose argument interpret this discovery?

    A proponent of Paley's design qua purpose argument would likely interpret this discovery as strong evidence for a divine designer. They would argue that the planet's intricate balance, specific atmospheric composition, and interdependent ecosystems are too complex and purposeful to have arisen purely by chance. Similar to how a watch's complexity implies a watchmaker, the planet's features would suggest a vastly more powerful designer – God.

29. Card 29

    What is the core idea behind Tennant's aesthetic principle, and how does it support the existence of God?

    Tennant's aesthetic principle argues that humanity's ability to perceive and appreciate beauty cannot be explained by natural selection alone, as it doesn't directly aid survival. Therefore, he concludes that God must have intervened in the evolutionary process to imbue humans with this capacity, thus providing evidence for God's existence.

30. Card 30

    Which of the following best describes Hume's primary criticism of design arguments from analogy?

    A) Hume argued that the universe is too simple to require a designer. B) Hume claimed that the universe is more organic than mechanical, making analogies to man-made machines flawed. C) Hume suggested that the problem of evil disproves a benevolent designer. D) Hume believed that modern science had already disproven the need for a designer. B) Hume criticized design arguments from analogy by stating that the universe is not like a mechanical, man-made object such as a watch; instead, it is more organic. This dissimilarity makes analogies between the universe and human artifacts weak and unreliable for inferring a designer.

31. Card 31

    How does the theory of evolution present a challenge to Paley's design argument, and how do Tennant's principles attempt to address this challenge?

    Evolution undermines Paley's argument by explaining how complex, seemingly designed features in organisms can arise through purely natural processes of variation and natural selection, without the need for a designer. Tennant's anthropic principle counters this by arguing that the precise cosmological and chemical conditions necessary for evolution to occur are so rare and well-suited that they must have been designed. His aesthetic principle further suggests that our capacity for beauty, not essential for survival, indicates divine intervention in evolution.

32. Card 32

    Explain Hume's Epicurean hypothesis and how it offers an alternative explanation for an orderly universe without a designer.

    Hume's Epicurean hypothesis suggests that an orderly and complex universe could arise purely by chance if the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time. Given an infinite timeframe, every possible arrangement of matter is bound to occur, including one that appears orderly and complex, without the need for an intelligent designer.

33. Card 33

    Why is the problem of evil considered a significant challenge to the teleological argument, particularly one that posits a benevolent designer?

    The problem of evil challenges the teleological argument by questioning the nature of the designer. If the universe was designed by an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving God, then the existence of suffering, pain, and moral evil in the world seems inconsistent with such a benevolent creator. This suggests either that the designer is not all-loving, not all-powerful, or does not exist, thereby undermining the conclusion of a perfect designer.

34. Card 34

    DEFINITION: Distinguish between an 'a priori' and an 'a posteriori' argument, and categorize the ontological argument accordingly.

    An a priori argument is based on reason and logic alone, independent of experience, while an a posteriori argument relies on empirical evidence and experience. The ontological argument is categorized as a priori because it attempts to prove God's existence through a logical analysis of the concept of God, rather than through observations of the world.

35. Card 35

    According to Anselm's first ontological argument, what is the logical progression from the concept of God as the greatest being to His existence?

    Anselm's first ontological argument posits that God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived.' He then argues that it is greater to exist in reality than merely in the mind. Therefore, if God is the greatest conceivable being, He must necessarily exist in reality, because a being that existed only in the mind would not be as great as one that existed in reality.

36. Card 36

    How did Anselm develop his ontological argument to include the concept of necessary existence?

    Anselm developed his argument by stating that it is greater to be a necessary being than a contingent being. Since God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived,' and a necessary being is greater than a contingent one, God must therefore exist necessarily. This means God's existence is not dependent on anything else.

37. Card 37

    Imagine a philosopher is trying to convince an atheist that God exists based purely on the definition of God. They state, 'God is the supremely perfect being, and a supremely perfect being must possess all perfections.' What would be the next logical step in their argument, following Descartes' ontological argument?

    Following Descartes' ontological argument, the next logical step would be to assert that existence is a perfection. Therefore, if God is the supremely perfect being and existence is a perfection, then God must necessarily possess the perfection of existence. This leads to the conclusion that God exists, just as a triangle must have three sides.

38. Card 38

    Which of the following analogies did Descartes use to explain the relationship between God and existence in his ontological argument?

    A) A watch and a watchmaker. B) An archer and an arrow. C) A mountain and a valley, or a triangle and having three sides. D) A perfect island and its features. C) Descartes used the analogies of a mountain and a valley, or a triangle and having three sides, to illustrate his point. He argued that just as one cannot conceive of a mountain without a valley, or a triangle without three sides, one cannot conceive of God without existence, because existence is an essential perfection of God.

39. Card 39

    Explain the logical steps in Malcolm's ontological argument that lead to the conclusion of God's necessary existence.

    Malcolm's argument begins by stating that God, as an unlimited being, either exists or does not. If God exists, nothing could stop Him from existing, making His existence necessary. If God does not exist, nothing could bring Him into existence, making His existence impossible. Since God is not an illogical or self-contradictory idea (and thus not impossible), by process of elimination, God must exist necessarily.

40. Card 40

    What was Gaunilo's 'perfect lost island' objection to Anselm's ontological argument?

    Gaunilo's 'perfect lost island' objection argued that if Anselm's logic were sound, one could conceive of a 'perfect island'—an island than which no greater could be conceived. Applying Anselm's reasoning, it would be greater for this perfect island to exist in reality than merely in the mind, thus implying that such a perfect island must exist. Gaunilo intended this to show the absurdity of Anselm's argument by applying it to a contingent object.

41. Card 41

    How did Anselm respond to Gaunilo's perfect lost island objection?

    Anselm responded by distinguishing between contingent and necessary beings. He argued that an island, no matter how perfect, is a contingent being—its existence depends on other things (e.g., a sea). The concept of 'greatest being' applies only to a being whose non-existence is inconceivable, a necessary being. Therefore, his logic works for God, who must exist necessarily, but not for a perfect island, which remains contingent.

42. Card 42

    DEFINITION: What does Kant mean when he states that 'existence is not a predicate' in his critique of the ontological argument?

    When Kant states that 'existence is not a predicate,' he means that existence does not add a descriptive quality or characteristic to a concept, like 'blue' or 'tall' would. Instead, 'existence' merely affirms that the subject of a concept is actualized in reality. It doesn't enrich the concept itself, but rather states whether the concept has an instance in the world.

43. Card 43

    Why is the inductive nature of the teleological argument considered a weakness compared to a deductive argument?

    The inductive nature of the teleological argument is considered a weakness because, unlike deductive arguments where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion, inductive arguments only provide probable support. Even if the premises are true, the conclusion might still be false. This means the teleological argument cannot offer logical proof of God's existence, only a strong likelihood or inference.

44. Card 44

    According to Tennant's anthropic principle, what specific conditions are cited as evidence for God's design?

    A) The existence of complex ecosystems on Earth. B) The precise and rare cosmological and chemical conditions required for life and evolution. C) The human capacity for moral reasoning. D) The historical accounts of divine intervention. B) Tennant's anthropic principle argues that the universe's precise and rare cosmological and chemical conditions, which are perfectly suited for the emergence and development of life and evolution, are too improbable to have occurred by chance. He concludes that these conditions must have been designed by God.

45. Card 45

    A scientist argues that the intricate structure of a bird's wing, perfectly adapted for flight, is entirely explainable by millions of years of natural selection. How would Paley likely respond to this claim, and what counter-argument might he offer?

    Paley would likely acknowledge the apparent adaptation but maintain that the complexity and clear purpose (flight) of the wing still point to a designer. He might argue that while natural selection explains the refinement of features, it doesn't adequately explain the initial creation of such a complex, purposeful structure from scratch. He would use his watchmaker analogy, asserting that even if a watch could 'evolve' some features, its fundamental design still implies an initial designer.

46. Card 46

    How does modern science, particularly regarding the Big Bang theory, impact Hume's Epicurean hypothesis?

    Modern science, specifically the Big Bang theory, suggests that the universe has not existed forever but had a finite beginning. This directly challenges Hume's Epicurean hypothesis, which relies on an infinite timeframe for an orderly universe to arise purely by chance. If the universe has a finite age, the probability of complex order arising by chance alone becomes significantly lower, thus weakening Hume's alternative explanation.

47. Card 47

    DEFINITION: What is the primary difference between a 'necessary being' and a 'contingent being' in the context of ontological arguments?

    A necessary being is one whose existence is logically impossible to deny; it must exist and cannot not exist. Its existence is self-sufficient and not dependent on anything else. A contingent being, conversely, is one whose existence is dependent on something else and could conceivably not exist. Ontological arguments often attempt to prove God as a necessary being.

48. Card 48

    Why is the ontological argument considered 'a priori' and 'deductive'?

    The ontological argument is considered 'a priori' because it relies solely on reason and the analysis of concepts (specifically the concept of God), without any appeal to empirical observation or experience. It is 'deductive' because, if its premises are accepted as true, the conclusion that God exists is claimed to follow with logical necessity, meaning the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.

49. Card 49

    Which philosopher used the analogy of an archer and an arrow to illustrate the concept of goal-directedness in the universe?

    A) William Paley B) Thomas Aquinas C) David Hume D) Immanuel Kant B) Thomas Aquinas used the analogy of an archer and an arrow in his 5th Way of demonstrating God's existence. He argued that just as an arrow moving towards a target implies an archer who directed it, the goal-directed behavior of inanimate objects in the universe implies a divine intelligence guiding them.

50. Card 50

    A theologian is presenting the argument that the universe's fine-tuning for life is evidence of God. An audience member counters by saying, 'But what about all the suffering and natural disasters? If God designed the universe, why is there so much evil?' How might the theologian respond using a common theodicy?

    The theologian might respond by employing a theodicy, such as the Irenaean or Augustinian view. For example, an Irenaean response would suggest that evil and suffering are not flaws in design but rather necessary components for human spiritual growth and character development. Overcoming challenges and making moral choices in a world with genuine suffering allows humans to become truly virtuous, thus serving a greater purpose in God's overall design.

51. Card 51

    Define Malcolm's ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Malcolm's ontological argument states that God, as an unlimited being, either exists or does not. If God exists, His existence is necessary; if He does not, His existence is impossible. Since God is not an illogical concept, He cannot be impossible, therefore He must exist necessarily.

52. Card 52

    How does Anselm respond to Gaunilo's perfect lost island objection?

    Anselm argues that Gaunilo's objection fails because an island, no matter how great, is contingent and dependent on other things for its existence. In contrast, the greatest being (God) is necessary and not dependent on anything else, meaning the logic of necessary existence only applies to God.

53. Card 53

    Explain Kant's objection to the ontological argument regarding existence as a predicate.

    Kant objects that Anselm and Descartes mistakenly treat 'existence' as a predicate, like a descriptive quality of a thing. Kant argues that existence is not a description of what a thing is, but rather indicates whether a thing exists, and therefore adds nothing to the concept of a being.

54. Card 54

    According to Malcolm, why is Kant's objection about existence as a predicate only valid for contingent things?

    Malcolm agrees with Kant regarding contingent existence, stating that for contingent things like a cat, existence is not a predicate. However, for a necessary being, its existence is inherent and defines it, meaning necessary existence *is* a predicate for such a being.

55. Card 55

    What is Hume's objection to the concept of a 'necessary being'?

    Hume argues that the concept of a 'necessary being' is meaningless because we can imagine God not existing. He claims that whatever we can imagine to exist, we can also imagine not to exist, thus no being can be truly necessary.

56. Card 56

    How does the 'masked man fallacy' challenge Hume's objection to a necessary being?

    The 'masked man fallacy' suggests that our ability to imagine something does not equate to its possibility. We can imagine the masked man not being our father, even if he is. Similarly, imagining God not existing might be imagining the impossible if God is, in fact, necessary.

57. Card 57

    Distinguish between natural evil and moral evil, providing an example of each.

    Natural evil results from the workings of the natural world, such as diseases like cancer or natural disasters like hurricanes. Moral evil, on the other hand, stems from human actions, like murder, theft, or even human-induced climate change.

58. Card 58

    Why is natural evil considered a problem for God's existence?

    Natural evil poses a problem for God's existence because it suggests that an all-powerful and all-loving God, who supposedly has total control over the natural world, would intervene to prevent such suffering if He existed.

59. Card 59

    Why is moral evil considered a problem for God's existence?

    Moral evil is a problem for God's existence because it raises questions about why an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God would allow horrific human actions, such as the Holocaust, to occur without intervention.

60. Card 60

    According to Epicurus, if God is willing to prevent evil but not able, what does this imply about God?

    If God is willing to prevent evil but not able, then Epicurus concludes that God is not all-powerful. This contradicts the traditional understanding of God's omnipotence.

61. Card 61

    What is Mackie's 'inconsistent triad' in the problem of evil?

    Mackie's inconsistent triad argues that it is logically impossible for an omnibenevolent God, an omnipotent God, and evil to all co-exist. He states that if there is a being with the power and motivation to eliminate evil, then evil should not exist.

62. Card 62

    How does William Rowe use the immense scale of suffering as evidence against God's existence?

    Rowe argues that the sheer immensity of suffering, particularly that which seems pointless like a fawn burning in a forest fire, is far more than could ever be useful or purposeful. This gratuitous suffering serves as evidence against the existence of a perfect God who would not allow such things.

63. Card 63

    What specific example does Gregory S. Paul use to highlight the problem of natural evil?

    Gregory S. Paul uses the example of infant death as a strong case of natural evil. He points out that infants are innocent and too young to understand their suffering, making it difficult to conceive of any purpose for such an event from a benevolent God.

64. Card 64

    Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of moral evil? A) It results from human actions. B) It includes acts like murder and theft. C) It can lead to environmental damage. D) It is caused by natural disasters.

    D) It is caused by natural disasters. Natural disasters are examples of natural evil, not moral evil, which stems from human actions.

65. Card 65

    According to Epicurus, if God is able to prevent evil but not willing, what is the implication?

    If God is able to prevent evil but not willing, then Epicurus concludes that God is not all-loving. This challenges the attribute of omnibenevolence typically ascribed to God.

66. Card 66

    Consider a scenario where a devastating earthquake strikes a densely populated area, causing widespread death and destruction. Which type of evil does this represent, and why is it a problem for God's existence?

    This scenario represents natural evil, as it results from the workings of the natural world. It poses a problem for God's existence because it's difficult to reconcile with the idea of an all-powerful and all-loving God who could presumably intervene to prevent such suffering but does not.

67. Card 67

    Imagine a situation where a group of individuals conspires to defraud elderly people of their life savings through elaborate scams. Which type of evil is this, and how does it challenge the concept of an omnibenevolent God?

    This is an example of moral evil, as it results directly from human actions and choices. It challenges the concept of an omnibenevolent God by raising the question of why a loving deity would permit such malicious acts to occur and cause immense suffering to innocent individuals.

68. Card 68

    A philosopher argues that the concept of a 'necessary being' is incoherent because anything we can conceive of not existing, cannot be necessary. Which philosopher is most likely making this argument?

    Hume is most likely making this argument. His objection states that because we can imagine God not existing, God (or any being) cannot be necessary, as whatever we can imagine to exist we can imagine to not exist.

69. Card 69

    If someone argues that 'existence' is a property that adds to the greatness of a being, and therefore a perfect being must possess it, they are treating existence as a: A) Contingency B) Predicate C) Paradox D) Necessity

    B) Predicate. This argument treats existence as a descriptive quality or property of a thing, which is what Kant objected to in the ontological argument.

70. Card 70

    How does Malcolm's argument about necessary existence being a predicate differ from Kant's general view on predicates?

    Malcolm agrees with Kant that existence is not a predicate for contingent things. However, he distinguishes by arguing that for a *necessary* being, its necessary existence defines it and contains the reason for its own existence, thus making necessary existence a predicate in this specific case.

71. Card 71

    Consider a situation where a child is born with a severe genetic disease that causes lifelong pain and ultimately an early death. How would Gregory S. Paul likely use this example in his argument against God's existence?

    Gregory S. Paul would likely use this as an example of infant death and suffering, which he considers a strong case of natural evil. He would argue that the innocence of the child and the seemingly pointless suffering make it difficult to reconcile with the existence of an all-loving and all-powerful God.

72. Card 72

    What is the core logical problem Epicurus identifies when considering the attributes of God and the presence of evil?

    Epicurus's core logical problem is that it seems impossible for an all-loving and all-powerful God to coexist with evil. He presents a dilemma where any combination of God's willingness and ability to prevent evil leads to a contradiction of His divine attributes or questions His nature.

73. Card 73

    According to Mackie's inconsistent triad, which of the following is NOT logically possible to coexist? A) An omnipotent God, an omniscient God, and free will. B) An omnibenevolent God, an omnipotent God, and the existence of evil. C) A contingent being, a necessary being, and a perfect world. D) Natural evil, moral evil, and human suffering.

    B) An omnibenevolent God, an omnipotent God, and the existence of evil. Mackie argues that these three concepts form an inconsistent triad, meaning they cannot logically all be true at the same time.

74. Card 74

    A theologian argues that the suffering of animals, such as a fawn dying in a forest fire with no human witness, is not a problem for God because it serves a greater, unknowable purpose within the natural ecosystem. How would William Rowe likely counter this argument?

    William Rowe would likely counter by arguing that such immense and seemingly pointless suffering, especially for animals who cannot learn or grow from it, is far more than could ever be useful or purposeful. He would question what 'greater purpose' could justify such gratuitous pain, especially when no one is there to witness or benefit from it.

75. Card 75

    Explain the difference in how Anselm and Gaunilo view the contingency of existence in their arguments regarding a 'perfect' entity.

    Anselm argues that a truly perfect being (God) must have necessary existence, meaning it is not dependent on anything else. Gaunilo, in his island objection, applies Anselm's logic to a 'perfect island,' but Anselm counters that an island, no matter how perfect, is contingent and dependent on other factors, thus not fitting the criteria for necessary existence.

76. Card 76

    Define Mackie's 'inconsistent triad' in the context of the problem of evil.

    Mackie's inconsistent triad posits that three statements cannot logically co-exist: God is omnipotent, God is omnibenevolent, and evil exists. If God is all-powerful and all-loving, he would prevent evil; therefore, the existence of evil suggests a contradiction in these attributes.

77. Card 77

    How does the a priori and deductive nature of Mackie's argument strengthen its claim against the existence of an all-loving and all-powerful God?

    Mackie's argument is a priori and deductive, meaning it relies on logical analysis of concepts rather than empirical evidence. By analyzing the definitions of 'omnibenevolent,' 'omnipotent,' and 'evil,' he argues that it's logically impossible for them to co-exist, making his conclusion necessarily true if the premises are accepted, regardless of observed evil.

78. Card 78

    A community is devastated by a natural disaster, leading to immense suffering and loss of innocent lives. How might William Rowe use this scenario to argue against the existence of a perfect God?

    William Rowe would point to the immense suffering and loss of innocent lives in this disaster as evidence against a perfect God. He would argue that such widespread and seemingly pointless suffering, especially involving those who cannot learn from it, is far more than could ever be useful or purposeful, thus contradicting the idea of an all-loving and all-powerful deity.

79. Card 79

    Which of the following best summarizes Augustine's primary claim regarding why God allows evil? A) Evil is a necessary component for human free will. B) Evil is a test of faith from God. C) All evil is either sin or punishment for sin, deserved due to original sin. D) Evil is an illusion and does not truly exist.

    C) All evil is either sin or punishment for sin, deserved due to original sin. Augustine claimed that humans deserve evil because they are born with original sin, a corruption inherited from Adam and Eve's Fall, making all evil either a direct sin or a just punishment for sin.

80. Card 80

    Explain the concept of 'privation' as Augustine uses it to describe evil.

    Augustine describes evil as a 'privation,' meaning it is not a substance or a created entity, but rather a lack or absence of goodness. Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence or corruption of the good that God created, caused by humanity's turning away from God's goodness.

81. Card 81

    DEFINITION: Distinguish between the core tenets of Augustinian and Irenaean theodicies regarding the purpose of evil.

    Augustine's theodicy claims that God allows evil because humanity deserves it as a punishment for original sin, viewing evil as a privation of good. Irenaeus's theodicy, conversely, argues that God allows evil for the purpose of 'soul-making,' enabling humans to develop moral character and grow into God's likeness through choosing good over evil.

82. Card 82

    A young child is diagnosed with a terminal illness and dies before reaching an age of understanding. How would Gregory S. Paul use this situation to challenge the idea of a benevolent God?

    Gregory S. Paul would highlight this as a strong example of natural evil, specifically infant death. He would argue that an innocent child, too young to understand or learn from suffering, experiencing such a fate is difficult to reconcile with a loving God who would permit such seemingly purposeless and unjust suffering.

83. Card 83

    How does Augustine's concept of original sin connect to his explanation of why all humans deserve evil?

    Augustine posits that after Adam and Eve's sin during the 'Fall,' all subsequent humans are born with original sin, a fundamental corruption in human nature. This inherited sin causes an irresistible temptation to sin, making all humans inherently deserving of punishment, and thus, deserving of evil.

84. Card 84

    According to Irenaeus, what is the primary purpose of evil in the world? A) To punish humanity for their sins. B) To allow humans to develop their moral character and grow into God's likeness. C) To demonstrate God's omnipotence by overcoming it. D) To serve as a contrast to highlight God's goodness.

    B) To allow humans to develop their moral character and grow into God's likeness. Irenaeus believed that humans were created in God's image and needed to grow into his likeness, which requires the existence of evil so they can choose good and develop their souls.

85. Card 85

    Imagine a person who endures significant hardship and suffering, which ultimately leads them to become more compassionate and resilient. How might an Irenaean perspective interpret this individual's experience?

    An Irenaean perspective would interpret this individual's experience as an example of 'soul-making.' The hardships, though painful, served a good purpose by providing the challenges necessary for the person to choose good, develop moral character, and grow into God's likeness, becoming a more fully-formed and virtuous individual.

86. Card 86

    What is a significant criticism of Augustine's theodicy regarding the fairness of God, particularly concerning the concept of original sin?

    A significant criticism is that a loving God would not blame or punish individuals for the actions of their distant ancestors, Adam and Eve. While Augustine clarifies that individuals are punished for their own original sin, critics argue it still seems unfair for a child to inherently 'deserve' suffering due to an inherited corruption they had no part in causing.

87. Card 87

    DEFINITION: What does 'soul-making' mean in the context of Irenaean theodicy?

    In Irenaean theodicy, 'soul-making' refers to the process by which humans develop their moral character and grow into God's likeness. It posits that evil is necessary because it provides the challenges and opportunities for individuals to choose good over evil, thereby becoming fully-formed, virtuous people deserving of heaven.

88. Card 88

    Which of the following is a common criticism leveled against Irenaean theodicy concerning the nature of suffering? A) It overemphasizes the role of free will. B) It suggests that God is not truly omnipotent. C) Some evil appears purposeless or 'soul-breaking' rather than 'soul-making'. D) It relies too heavily on scientific evidence.

    C) Some evil appears purposeless or 'soul-breaking' rather than 'soul-making'. Critics argue that some suffering, like a child dying of cancer or an adult becoming depressed from illness, doesn't lead to moral development and can even destroy a person's spirit, thus not serving a 'soul-making' purpose.

89. Card 89

    A parent loses a child to a tragic accident and struggles deeply with their faith, questioning God's goodness. How might an Augustinian perspective respond to this parent's suffering?

    An Augustinian perspective would respond by stating that all evil is either sin or punishment for sin. While not directly blaming the child, it would suggest that the suffering, including the loss, is ultimately a consequence of humanity's original sin and the resulting corruption in the world, which makes all humans deserving of punishment.

90. Card 90

    How does the scientific understanding of evolution challenge the historical basis of Augustine's theodicy?

    The scientific understanding of evolution directly challenges Augustine's historical account of the 'Fall' and the literal existence of Adam and Eve. If there was no singular 'Fall' event as described, then the concept of original sin being inherited from them, which is central to Augustine's explanation for evil, loses its foundational premise.

91. Card 91

    DEFINITION: What is the core difference in how William Rowe and Gregory S. Paul present the problem of evil compared to Mackie's inconsistent triad?

    Mackie's inconsistent triad is an a priori, deductive argument based on the logical incompatibility of God's attributes and evil's existence. Rowe and Paul, conversely, present the problem of evil as empirical evidence against God's existence, pointing to specific instances of immense, seemingly pointless suffering (like animal suffering or infant death) to argue against a perfect God.

92. Card 92

    Why might some argue that Irenaeus's theodicy is 'superior' to Augustine's in portraying a loving God, despite its own criticisms?

    Irenaeus's theodicy can be seen as superior because it posits that God allows evil for a constructive, loving purpose – the moral development and 'soul-making' of humanity. This contrasts with Augustine's view that evil is primarily a deserved punishment, which some find less compatible with the idea of an all-loving God.

93. Card 93

    A person witnesses an act of extreme cruelty and becomes deeply cynical, losing faith in humanity and God. How might a critic of Irenaean theodicy use this scenario to challenge the idea of 'soul-making'?

    A critic of Irenaean theodicy would use this scenario to argue that some evil is 'soul-breaking' rather than 'soul-making.' Instead of leading to moral growth, the witness's experience resulted in cynicism and loss of faith, demonstrating that suffering can degrade a person's character rather than improve it, thus undermining the 'soul-making' premise.

94. Card 94

    According to Mackie's inconsistent triad, if God is both willing and able to prevent evil, then what is the logical conclusion? A) Evil must not exist. B) God is not truly all-powerful. C) God is not truly all-loving. D) Evil serves a greater purpose.

    A) Evil must not exist. Mackie's argument states that if an all-powerful being is willing to prevent evil, and is able to, then evil should not exist. The presence of evil therefore contradicts at least one of these premises.

95. Card 95

    Explain why the suffering of animals, as highlighted by William Rowe, poses a particular challenge to the idea of a purposeful evil allowed by God.

    The suffering of animals, such as a fawn burning in a forest fire, poses a particular challenge because animals are generally not considered capable of moral choice or 'soul-making' in the human sense. If evil is meant for human moral development or punishment, then animal suffering, especially when unseen and seemingly pointless, appears to lack any discernible purpose from a divine perspective, thus challenging God's benevolence.

96. Card 96

    DEFINITION: What does it mean for an argument to be 'a priori and deductive' as applied to Mackie's inconsistent triad?

    An argument that is 'a priori and deductive' means it is based on reasoning from definitions and logical principles, independent of sensory experience. For Mackie's inconsistent triad, this means the conclusion about the logical impossibility of an all-loving, all-powerful God existing with evil is derived solely from the analysis of the terms 'omnibenevolent,' 'omnipotent,' and 'evil,' rather than from observing evil in the world.

97. Card 97

    Consider a situation where a person commits a heinous crime. How would Augustine's theodicy explain the presence of such evil in the world?

    Augustine's theodicy would explain this crime as a manifestation of human sin, stemming from original sin. The individual, born with a corrupted nature, succumbed to the irresistible temptation to sin, and thus, their evil act is either a direct sin or a deserved consequence of humanity's fallen state.

98. Card 98

    How does the Irenaean concept of humans being created in God's 'image' but needing to grow into his 'likeness' justify the existence of evil?

    Irenaeus argues that being created in God's 'image' gives humans the potential for goodness, but to achieve God's 'likeness' requires moral development. Evil exists to provide the necessary challenges and opportunities for humans to freely choose good over evil, thereby actively shaping their character and growing into a mature, virtuous state that truly reflects God's moral attributes.

99. Card 99

    Which criticism applies to both Augustinian and Irenaean theodicies regarding the problem of innocent suffering? A) Both fail to account for the existence of free will. B) Both struggle to explain why a loving God would allow innocent children to suffer or die. C) Both rely too heavily on the concept of divine intervention. D) Both are incompatible with the idea of human responsibility.

    B) Both struggle to explain why a loving God would allow innocent children to suffer or die. Augustine's view implies even children deserve suffering due to original sin, which seems harsh for a loving God. Irenaeus's 'soul-making' is challenged by the idea that infants are too young to learn or develop from suffering.

100. Card 100

     Why is it argued that Augustine's theodicy 'fits better with God's perfect justice' than Irenaeus's, despite its criticisms?

     Augustine's theodicy is argued to fit better with God's perfect justice because it posits that evil is a deserved punishment for sin, aligning with the idea of a just God who holds humanity accountable. In contrast, Irenaeus's 'soul-making' could be seen as less just if it implies God intentionally allows suffering for developmental purposes, especially if that suffering seems disproportionate or purposeless.

More flashcard decks

• Thermochemistry and Thermodynamics flashcards (149 cards)
• Género Bacillus y Clostridium flashcards (100 cards)
• Ψηφιακά Παιχνίδια και Μάθηση flashcards (100 cards)
• Nervous system flashcards (100 cards)
• ECG, IGEL and Iv flashcards (100 cards)
• Biology - Year 11 flashcards (100 cards)

Browse every shared deck